![]() Using JSON in your URLs will have a bunch of up-front annoyances to resolve, but the overall benefits might make it worth trying. Once it's past that check, you should only see the decoded string in any error messages or logging output.Ĭreating a clean abstraction takes extra work, especially if you've been used to getting away without it. Similarly, you shouldn't have to deal with the ugly version of the URL unless you have an invalid URL. For example, you don't ever deal with raw network packets unless something goes wrong at the packet level. This page describes: All headers used by the JSON API. It also looks ugly, but that can be solved by taking abstraction seriously. The Cloud Storage API uses standard HTTP headers as well as several extension (custom) HTTP headers. This can become a problem if it starts pushing you past the practical URL length limit. So why not use JSON in the URL as well? Well, there's this: But many APIs, including Dropbox's newer APIs, have been moving toward using JSON in the request body. One nice thing about URL encoding is that you can have nice "curl" command-line examples. OAuth 2 switched to JSON.ĪPI request bodies seem split between JSON and URL encoding. In the example above they have default values of skip0 and. ![]() The last time I dealt with a URL encoded response body was for OAuth 1, which was finalized in 2007. All the same process that applied for path parameters also applies for query parameters: Editor support (obviously) Data 'parsing' Data validation Automatic documentation Defaults As query parameters are not a fixed part of a path, they can be optional and can have default values. HTTP API responses for structured data are almost always JSON. When you think about it, we've already all sort of decided that JSON is better than URL encoding for some things. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |